Search for: "People v. Powell" Results 341 - 360 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am by Anna Christensen
Powell when it held that the Miranda warnings given to Doody were inadequate; whether the Ninth Circuit disregarded the AEDPA in holding that Doody’s statements were involuntary.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: Camreta v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:43 am by Jeffrey Kirchmeier
Around that same time, former Justice Lewis Powell revealed he regretted his votes upholding the death penalty. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am by Lawrence Taylor
"I know they are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
AriLaakkonen (Powell Gilbert), moderator of the second part of the panel,  began with a question and the first of many analogies. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The player that seems to me to be missing from this great melodrama of constitutional cynicism is we the people, that is, the democratic as well as the, well, constituent aspect of the constitution. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:04 pm
With remarkable frankness, she acknowledged that in her time many people felt that the DoJ had pushed the balance too far in favour of implementers. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Launch of Westlaw UK Insight, online encyclopaedia of law Professor Stewart Purvis’ round up of the Newsnight sagas NUJ: Claudia Jones Memorial Lecture: Newcastle 2012 [video] In the Courts On 11 December 2012 judgment was handed down in the privacy case Price v Powell & Ors [2012] EWHC 3527 (QB). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am by Mary L. Dudziak
See Powell, Stare Decisis and Judicial Restraint, 1991 Journal of Supreme Court History 13, 16. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
From the majority opinion in the new case, Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am by Kevin
The court holds that they acted in bad faith and for an improper purpose—and not (as Powell claimed at the hearing) seeking to change the law like Thurgood Marshall did in Brown v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” That sounds a lot like acceptance of Justice Powell’s approach in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]