Search for: "People v. Powell"
Results 341 - 360
of 689
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
” Twenty-five years later, in Grutter v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
Ohio or Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
” That sounds a lot like acceptance of Justice Powell’s approach in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:39 pm
On April 21, 1896, the Court of Appeals of New York in People v Barberi, 149 N.Y. 256 (available on Westlaw Next at this link) ruled that the judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial granted. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 8:27 pm
Powell.) [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
(citing Powell v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
In Powell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Montgomery v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:49 am
In Imbler v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 am
As I read the dissents I kept thinking about the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Moreover, even if an element of a pecuniary benefit from tippee to tipper was required, as Gupta argued, such a benefit was proved against Gupta at trial (U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Frankly, I am not sure there is a right answer to the question rather reasonably and informed people of good faith, certainly such people whom I respect of that nature, can hold diametrically opposed opinions. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:05 am
Supreme Court Justice (retired) 2002 Colin Powell, former U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
Powell? [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Larry was Justice Lewis Powell’s law clerk in 1972-73 when Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
In the case Batson v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 am
Just for kicks, here’s a piece from Justice Lewis Powell’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 3:27 am
In a claim for possession brought by a public authority, the European Convention on Human Rights, art 8, gives an occupier the right to challenge the proportionality of the eviction even if his right of occupation under domestic law has come to an end: Manchester CC v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45; [2011] 2 A.C. 104; [2011] H.L.R. 7; Hounslow LBC v Powell and other cases [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 A.C. 186; [2011] H.L.R. 23. [read post]
