Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 341 - 360
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2016, 12:08 pm
The statute, which takes some people by surprise,[i] grants private landowners a narrow power of eminent domain to acquire an access route to a landlocked parcel. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 12:00 am
McIntyre Mach. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
” In Trump v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 2:09 pm
This is the sovereign power at its nadir, not its zenith. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:05 pm
Zerkel, 900 P.2d 744 [Alaska App.1995] and the State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 5:04 am
Reviczky v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
The latter's a crime, to be sure, and almost assuredly the more serious one -- after all, there are power differentials, the potential for abuse and/or quid pro quos, etc. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 12:37 pm
In Ellis v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
Reflecting this same outlook, the Supreme Court held in 1838 in Kendall v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
” The general manager also observed that the person’s “walk and body style” were similar to those of Hampton, whom the general manager described as a “very clean, crisp, very mus[cl]y man, very, very strong powerful man. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: Moody v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
Belmont --Notes and Questions --Baker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
These are smart people on the Court, surely they could find a reason to return these political cases back to the elected branches and say, "you guys have to figure this out. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm
But the process used seems a pretty powerful way to deliver a specific message. [read post]
11 May 2007, 9:10 am
" Sort of gives you the illusion of power. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 2:29 pm
Or at least make a "rule of lenity" or similar claim in an attempt to avoid a conviction.But, academic commentary aside, the powers that be say that an upside-down license violates the statute. [read post]
10 May 2007, 8:08 am
The third type of problem, exercise of power of without authority, is suggested by the Appellate Division's decision Tuesday in People of the State of New York, by Eliot Spitzer, the Attorney Gen. of the State of New York v Grasso, 2007 NY Slip Op 03990. [read post]
Defendant asleep inside had no veto power over consent, and the police did not have to ask him first
11 Oct 2007, 5:49 am
People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:01 am
’“ (People v. [read post]
