Search for: "People v. Reed" Results 341 - 360 of 810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Appreciate you are busy but it would be v helpful to have answers to qs about party status and existence/format of jmt. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
  We agree entirely with Lord Justice McFarlane as is also discussed in this new piece by Lucy Reed at the Justice Gap: 'Could do better': @Familoo of @seethrujustice on @cardiffuni evaluation of transparency reforms in family courts https://t.co/nVJVYj2420 pic.twitter.com/hadP0uw5kb — The Justice Gap (@JusticeGap) March 27, 2017 The Family Law Bar Association responded swiftly to what they considered ‘misreporting’ of another lecture – this time… [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm by familoo
I am grateful to Lucy Reed for pointing out that it has been considered in the context of family law. [read post]
While people probably overreacted following the decision this past summer, it was not without reason. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:12 am by Tim Springer
The Law Offices of Bemis, Roach and Reed specialize in helping people with disabilities win the benefits they need. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am by MATHEW PURCHASE
The majority (Lords Neuberger, Toulson, Reed and Sumption) held that it was not reasonable to expect a more peremptory notice. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:55 am
"The DJ also features CAFA Conundrum: Diversity is What Counts, by Reed Smith appellate specialists Jim Martin and David de Jesus, about the controversy over the scope of CAFA's appellate review provision, and noting that the 9th Circuit recently joined "the 5th, 6th, and 8th Circuits in holding that CAFA's appellate review provision is limited to remand orders where a party claims diversity jurisdiction under CAFA" in Chan Healthcare Group, PS v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  One thing people are realizing is that TM is messy. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:32 am by Law Offices of David L. Freidberg, P.C.
What some consider to be harmless exhibitionism may meet the statutory minimum for the crime of public indecency (see People v Reed). [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
Background The Supreme Court has upheld a challenge to the “named person” provisions of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014. [read post]