Search for: "People v. Roberts" Results 341 - 360 of 6,788
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Michael C. Dorf
But there's another reason why it's at best ambivalent support for the Roberts view: de jure racial segregation has the purpose and effect of separating people based on race, placing people in different schools. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Instead, they rely on pragmatic common sense, sense of justice and experiential wisdom that engages with the sheer destruction wrought by a sadistic media on real people’s lives. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Chief Justice Roberts wrote for the Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 8:00 am
The Kent result was a fortunate fluke for a relative handful of people. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:39 am by Mark Graber
  “In our federal system,” Chief Justice Roberts declares in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:28 am
" But no, what Alito did (joined by Roberts and Kennedy) was to make a great effort to preserve Flast.In their Senate confirmation hearings Roberts and Alito both declared their reverence for precedent; they might be reluctant openly to admit that they deceived the Senate and the people. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by JB
Instead, Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion relies primarily on the 1982 5-4 decision in Nixon v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Attorneys irritate people all the time, and irritated people act. [read post]