Search for: "People v. Rowe" Results 341 - 360 of 1,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2010, 8:33 am by Steve Hall
The briefs were filed in support of a petition of certiorari pending before the Court, Kevin Keith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:56 am by Josh Wright
A fun example for contracts class, to be paired with Judge Kimba Wood’s opinion in Leonard v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:40 pm
The fact is a number of people on death row did not have competent counsel representing them. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:23 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" The second segment discusses a Texas death penalty case, Ayestas v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm by Steve Hall
Incredulous Supreme Court justices on Tuesday repeatedly questioned why the New Orleans district attorney’s office never gave defense lawyers statements from the only witness in a murder trial that could have cast doubt on a death row inmate’s conviction of killing five people. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:04 am by Steve Hall
Judges and juries sometimes make mistakes.Justice isn't served by putting innocent people behind bars ... or on death row. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 9:19 am
The Florida Times-Union reports on a budget crisis for attorneys in Georgia who represent poor people charged with crimes punishable by the death penalty: Death row defense continues for now. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 7:35 pm by cdw
In the news DPIC reports that “twenty-seven people were exonerated and released from prison this year, including some who had been on death row, according to a new report from The Innocence Project, a national litigation and public policy organization dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted people. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 2:45 pm
  Making a death row inmate propose the method of execution, the product of the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in Glossip v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:35 pm by Rekha Arulanantham
Saenz, president and general counsel of MALDEF, which led the fight in Plyler v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm by Jon Sands
This was largely because the California Supreme Court ordered a hearing on the petitioner's claim under People v. [read post]