Search for: "People v. Souter"
Results 341 - 360
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2010, 10:21 am
Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen G. [read post]
20 May 2009, 6:43 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm
To be sure, there is general consensus that abortion should have limits, but the notion that the American people favor reversing Roe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
First, in Estes v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:00 am
Judge Forrester summarized the Server Test by referencing Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
Unlike any of my prior writings, the book is intended for a popular audience: people intrigued by how the Supreme Court decides cases as well as people who care deeply about the climate issue. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am
As the Court explained in Roth v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
In Blanch v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
Casey, coauthored with Justices Kennedy and Souter), and affirmative action (2003’s Grutter v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:09 pm
In People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:44 am
See, e.g., Teamsters v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:53 am
Souter. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:38 pm
V. [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:48 am
If a liberal legal academic cannot say publicly (if she believes it to be so) that Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
Rather, Justice Souter believes judges must look at the words and seek -- quote -- "to understand their meaning for living people. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:34 am
" In the book he attacks the Second Amendment decision in D.C. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:50 am
” Roberts announces that Justice Kennedy has the Court’s opinion this morning in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
The problem, however, is that some people just don’t much like being “n [read post]
