Search for: "People v. Stock"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
Bursac v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:49 pm
On top of all that: employees who receive stock under a stock plan won't count towards the total. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:04 pm
Divorce ends a relationship between two people, but it also requires them to separate their finances. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:08 am
Unknown to her, plaintiff's picture was sold to Getty Images, which compiles and sells stock photos. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:52 am
Chesterfield BC v Bailey is a highly instructive case heard at first instance by Recorder Tilbury in the Derby County Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:52 am
Chesterfield BC v Bailey is a highly instructive case heard at first instance by Recorder Tilbury in the Derby County Court. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:02 am
Dolin v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:04 pm
This act takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the 90 days after the final adjournment of the general assembly, except that if a referendum petition is filed under section 1 (3) of Article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:44 am
The Tax Court case of Walton v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:27 am
Business Services Co. et al. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:05 pm
The higher returns on capital will cause people to save more, to buy more American stocks and bonds, and to pump more money into their small businesses. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:20 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Exceptions Provide Jurisdiction in Action On Refusal to Convert Bonds to Stock Rogers v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am
Hearsay only applies to statements by people—computer-generated statements don’t have a hearsay problem. __ This seems like a win, of sorts, for platforms, although not a great result for Cox specifically. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:00 am
These New Deal decisions, in turn, were the result of “transformative appointments”—stocking the Court with allies of the New Deal, who would articulate the regime’s basic commitments in a series of key decisions like West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 1:00 pm
The company has seen its stock tank from $4.30 last April to $0.65 cents at its close on Friday. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 11:36 am
” In 2022, the US Supreme Court ruled in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 3:29 pm
Stern and Bowen v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
As a result of the vague standards set out in the statute the courts have developed a test to determine whether a nonprofit hospital is entitled to tax exemption.[7] The test was first articulated in Methodist Old Peoples Home v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm
This will not be IBP v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
This case is actually pretty much a redux the Steinberg v. [read post]
