Search for: "Perry v. State of California"
Results 341 - 360
of 786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2012, 4:33 pm
In 2010, in Perry v Schwarzenegger, the US District Court ruled that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional as a breach of the due process (right to marry) and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:53 pm
Browning Courthouse in San Francisco, California. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:18 pm
Schwarzenegger found a right of same-sex couples in California to marry; (2) Gill v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
In Legislature v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:30 pm
Perry, which examines whether the State of California violated the Due Process clause when voters enacted a law that prohibited Gay Marriage. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm
The California Coastal Commission (Commission) recently “ordered SeaWorld San Diego to halt captive breeding of orcas as a condition of getting a permit to build a larger exhibit space for the 11 marine mammals,” as reported by Tony Perry at latimes.com, a year after the breeding of cetaceans in captivity was banned at the Canadian aquarium. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
It seems possible that the Circuit Court will now ask both sides in the federal case of Perry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
Plaintiffs in Perry v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Box 7788 Santa Rosa, CA 95407-0788 Phone: (707) 566-8647 Fax: (707) 586-3279 E-mail: ucpnb@sonic.net UCP of the Golden Gate 1970 Broadway, Suite 600 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: (510) 832-7430 Fax: (510) 839-1329 E-mail: info@ucpgg.org Web: http://www.ucpgg.org UCP of Stanislaus County 1213 13th Street Modesto, CA 95354 Phone: (209) 577-2122 Fax: (209) 577-2392 E-mail: rlonczak@yahoo.com CALIFORNIA STATE RESOURCES AGING The California Association of Area Agencies on… [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 11:24 pm
[UPDATE: The court has granted the California Channel's request to televise the Perry v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
BLAG moved to dismiss the complaint stating that Baker v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
Perry v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 10:45 am
The Ninth Circuit began by reviewing California cases concerning intentional interference claims and concluded that “the California state cases are in accord that the validity and legality of the expectancy are not elements that must be proved by the plaintiff. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Schwarzenegger, the California same-sex marriage case, Gill v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:09 am
The following day, in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:17 am
V. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
The DOMA (Section 3) case before the high court was United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
Perry. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996), we have now declared that animus must have been the only conceivable motivation for a sovereign State to have remained committed to a definition of marriage that has existed for millennia, Perry v. [read post]
