Search for: "Person v. New York Post Corp" Results 341 - 360 of 963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Oreamuno, 248 N.E.2d 910 (N.Y. 1969), the leading insider trading derivative case (albeit a New York not Delaware precedent). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Back in 2009 – when the blog was still a Bexis/Herrmann operation – we wrote a catch-all punitive damages post entitled (oddly enough) “On Punitive Damages. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
Scott Oswald at The Employment Law Group, and Terri Gerstein and Sharon Block in an op-ed for The New York Times. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 4:05 am
The court relied first on the federal pleading requirements as described in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:12 am by Adam Chandler
The New York Times, USA Today. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
JEWELER'S BLOCK INSURANCE - BROKER'S CANCELLATION CLAUSE - PREMIUM FINANCE AGREEMENT - NEW YORK BANKING LAW § 576 - NON-COOPERATIOND&R Plaza Jewelry v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Even aside from that, the complaint alleges that plaintiff’s services are confined to the New York City area. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:00 am
City of New York, 975 N.Y.S.2d 711, 2013 WL 3497615 (N.Y. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
A witness statement referred to advice received from a practising American lawyer on the SPEECH Act, a federal version of the ‘Rachel’s Law’ statute introduced in New York State following a campaign by the Defendant in Bin Mahfouz v Ehrenfeld ([2005] EWHC 1156 (QB)] (a case in which an American author was found to have libelled a Saudi billionaire in a book published in the USA). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:35 am by Matthew D. Donovan
A recent post-trial decision out of Delaware’s Court of Chancery, Personal Touch Holding Corp. v Glaubach, brings home this lesson with similar colloquial color. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
This post is only from the Reed Smith (more properly, the non-Dechert) side of the blog.One hundred what, you say? [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 3:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Just days after a Southern District of New York judge ruled in the Medidata Solutions decision that the Computer Fraud section of a commercial crime policy covered losses from social engineering fraud  (as I discussed in a post last week), a judge in the Eastern District of Michigan has held that a crime policy’s computer fraud section did not apply to social engineering fraud. [read post]