Search for: "Peters, Appeal of" Results 341 - 360 of 6,739
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2023, 3:27 pm
(Technically, to avoid difficult appellate jurisdictional issues, the Court of Appeal treats the appeal as a petition for writ of mandate, which it then denies, but the effect is the same.) [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: b/c it’s not a substitute—it appeals to a different market. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
Here are three recent decisions under the mere descriptiveness prong of Section 2(e)(1): one opposition and two ex parte appeals. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
This is the latest development in the positive trend towards specialization started by the Barcelona Appeal Court in 1993 with the establishment of “Section 15” which, since then, has attracted all appeals in intellectual property matters (among others) in Barcelona. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, with Lord Justice Arnold giving the leading judgment and Lord Justice Stuart-Smith and Lady Justice Falk in agreement. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
Craig Wright, despite finding that Peter McCormack had caused serious damage to his reputation, Wright v McCormack [2023] EWCA Civ 892. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
In April 2019 Peter McCormack, a blogger and podcaster about cryptocurrency, posted a series of tweets about the appellant's claims and conduct. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:46 am by Seán Binder
Laurence Peter reports for BBC News. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
Thus he allowed Manitou’s appeal and made a permanent rule 31.22(2) order. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
But this flexibility is in line with decision G 2/21 of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal: it seems to be a recognition of ab initio implausibility, i.e., that evidence subsequent to the filing date can only be disregarded if the person skilled in the art had legitimate reasons to doubt that the technical effect could be obtained at the filing date (e.g., T919/15, T578/06, T2015/20). [read post]
On one end of the spectrum, supporters of the bill, led by opposition Member of Parliament (MP) Peter Kaluma, stand firm in their convictions. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Humanists’ membership of SACREs Humanist UK reports that Kent County Council has decided not to appeal the judgment in R (Bowen) v Kent County Council [2023] EWHC 1261 (Admin). [read post]