Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 341 - 360 of 7,465
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2024, 5:35 am by Unreported Opinions
Contracts — Debt collection — Timeliness This is a debt collection case that already has been to this Court twice and returns after remand to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to calculate the interest owed. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:30 pm by Daily Record Staff
Torts — Medical malpractice — Health Care Alternative Dispute Resolution Office This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City that dismissed Andrew Ndubisi Ucheomumu’s petition for the judicial review of a decision of the director of the Health Care Alternative Dispute Resolution Office (the “Office”). [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:15 pm
The Ninth Circuit includes various outlying territories. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm by Peter Spiro
by Peter Spiro The Supreme yesterday gave the green light to an individual asserting a Tenth Amendment defense in a criminal prosecution under a federal statute enacted pursuant to the Chemical Weapons Convention (Bond v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 1:54 pm
Circuit's Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:02 am
Here it is: Smith v Espada, Order to Show Cause, Justice Peters Smith v Espada, Decision, Judge McNamara Winner v Aponte, Order to Show Cause, Verified Petition Aubertine v [...] [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
In Foskett, Peters and Waschckuhn v Ezeugo [2018] EWHC 3694 (QB), three Judges applied for the committal to prison of a man who had repeatedly breached a harassment injunction made in their favour. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Peter Smith in Sports Direct International plc v Rangers International Football Club plc and another [2016] EWHC 85 (Ch) to refuse to commit the respondent for contempt for alleged breach of an injunction shows the caution that the court will sometimes show when it comes to seeking to enforce injunctive relief. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]