Search for: "Peters v. West"
Results 341 - 360
of 552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2014, 9:23 pm
Peter W. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:23 pm
Peter W. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
[Mechanicsburg, Pa.] : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2011.KFP81 .P4 NO.6942PropertyAmerican property : a history of how, why, and what we own / Stuart Banner.Banner, Stuart, 1963-Cambridge, Mass : Harvard University Press, 2011.KF562 .B36 2011PropertyReappraisals in the law of property / by John V. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
-China intellectual property debate / Peter K. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On 13 March 2012, Bean J granted an injunction in the case of BUQ v HRE. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm
West Australian Liberal MP Denis Jensen plans to sue The Australian for defamation. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:52 am
Peter Mahler has written about this unresolved legal question a number of times, with three articles on the subject available here. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm
It is reported that Tourism Board chairman Peter Lam Kin-ngok has succeeded in his libel claim against Hong Kong e-Sports founder Derek Cheung. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
(Docket Report) District Court C D California: Term ‘patent troll’ is ‘commonly used and understood in patent litigation’ and need not be stricken from pleadings: Highland Plastics v Sorenson Research & Development (Docket Report) (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Situs of material events in false marking cases is where marking occurred: Simonian v Maybelline (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) ITC terminates investigation and issues… [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Goodson, Unheralded and Transformative: The Test for Major Questions After West Virginia, 47 Wm. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(PLI) US Patents Constitutional separation of powers (Patently-O) Patent practitioner ethics update (Patently-O) Interesting claim on Big 3 patents – discussion of Detroit New editorial by James E Malackowski (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Lawyers getting patents: what should the rules be? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 2:39 pm
” In Montana v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am
Bennett ; legislation editor, Peter Bailey. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:00 am
Provides a nice link to the Yale article, and a link to LII, Peter W. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
" Griswold v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:46 am
visit superlawyers.com Peter S. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:08 pm
(I wrote some about this years ago in an essay review of Peter Karsten's Heart versus Head, at page 1191). [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
Clark Martin, who retired from Vinson & Elkins on Jan. 1, says among those planning to join Kelly Hart as Houston partners are two V&E partners who are close to that firm's mandatory retirement age of 67, and former Enron Corp. general counsel James V. [read post]
