Search for: "Petit v. Minnesota" Results 341 - 360 of 574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2014, 7:38 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Minnesota v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Jon Hyman
Supreme Court issued its first employment decision of 2014, Sandifer v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:40 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  Yesterday, the Minnesota Supreme Court granted the petition of the State of Minnesota for further review and granted the petition for conditional cross review of Final Exit Network, Inc., Lawrence Deems Egbert, and Roberta L. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:23 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Travis, 941 F.2d 1361 (8th Cir. 1991) (applying Minnesota and South Dakota law); BDO Seidman v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:45 am by Susan Brenner
The district court judge who had this case denied Nielsen’s petition and motion for a new trial because she found (i) that “the e-mails should have been disclosed under Brady v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
This is our third of three installments of “Petitions to watch” for the September 30 Conference. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm by Bill Marler
This prompts a Citizen’s Petition and federal judge’s ruling that orders the FDA to ban fluid raw milk and milk products from interstate commerce (21 CFR Section 1240.61). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
  Not so coincidentally, the defendants filed a petition for certiorari in the Neurontin trilogy the other day. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 9:56 pm by Andrew Moratzka
  As part of its petition, and consistent with Minnesota law, Minnesota Power sought to impose interim rates - the rates Minnesota utilities are permitted to collect while a petition to increase rates is pending. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:58 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Attorneys Fees & Costs Clearly Inappropriate] [Petition Granted] In Aly v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In a decision June 26 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]