Search for: "Phelps, Appeal of"
Results 341 - 360
of 402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
Leaving terms open for future agreement: Nutraceuticals v Mucos Pharma (The IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO launches patent prosecution highway to Finland (Managing Intellectual Property) Did you know... that all counterclaims asserted in section 337 cases are automatically removed to US District Court (ITC 337 Law Blog) Recent developments under section 337 of the Tariff Act (International Law Office) United Inventors Association patent to market mini-series: episode 1 ‘How… [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
It was later reported that the defendants intended to appeal. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
Phelps, the funeral protesting case. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
Rulings IPSO has published a series of rulings and a Resolution Statement from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 01019-18 Cantemir v Mail Online – Resolved via IPSO Mediation 18938-17 Johnson v The Sun – Breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) 20445-17 De Groote v thetimes.co.uk – No breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) after investigation 20562-17 Versi v dailystar.co.uk – Breach of Clause 1… [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
City of Asheville, the city government ordered the removal of the Zebulon Baird Vance Monument but was met by intense opposition by the plaintiff who filed a breach of contract claim, sought out a temporary restraining order, preliminary and permanent injunction, and declaratory judgment.[3] The plaintiffs attempted to use the North Carolina Historical Commission as a form of relief for their case, however the Court of Appeals in North Carolina went in favor of the city because the… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
We protect the right of Fred Phelps' family to protest at funerals even though the America of Phelps' dreams is a theocratic hellhole. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:28 am
The ACLU stayed out of this case even when a 9th circuit decision denying student speech rights was appealed to the Supreme Court (which vacated the 9th circuit’s deeply flawed ruling.) [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: District Court S D New York grants authors four more months to decide whether to participate in Google Book Search settlement; Department of Justice begin enquiry in antitrust implications of settlement (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) (Excess Copyright) (Out-Law) (EFF) Microsoft – Linux activists take on Microsoft with TomTom… [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
Thus, on appeal, the second circuit was effectively asked whether NU or the shareholder class plaintiff's acting on behalf of shareholders at the time of the breach were the better plaintiff/plaintiff representative. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:36 am
He is appealing is conviction. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Phelps, 580 F.3d 206, 219 n.13 (4th Cir. 2009), aff’d, 131 S. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
New Zealand In the case of Williams v Craig [2018] NZCA 31 the Court of Appeal set aside the High Court’s order for retrial of the claims for liability and damages but ordered a retrial of the damages claim on the ground that $1,27 million damages were excessive. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:51 pm
Court of Appeals, 1999), which allow a defamation claim against radio shock jocks who called the plaintiff a prostitute. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:41 pm
A great deal of litigation, in California and elsewhere has surrounded the issue of whether ride-service drivers should be construed as employees (or agents) of their “platform,” thereby rendering the platform or service vicariously liable for a driver’s negligently caused vehicular accidents. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:42 am
(sorry, sisters, you look great but you don't appeal to my market!) [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm
My student Elizabeth Arias and I — with the invaluable help of local counsel Michael F. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
On appeal, Pom scored a small victory: one randomized clinical trial (RCT) was enough in some cases, not the 2-RCT remedy imposed by the FTC for disease claims. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Jones Docket: 09-357 Issue: When a state court has reviewed the merits of a petitioner’s federal claim for plain error, is the decision of a federal court of appeals in a habeas corpus action that there was procedural default of that claim contrary to the decisions of this Court? [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
