Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips" Results 341 - 360 of 4,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 1:09 pm by Harold O'Grady
In Yonaty v Mincolla, an unreported case from Broome County Supreme Court, Judge Phillip R. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:38 pm
He suggests that because the Supreme Court is unlikely to overrule McCleskey v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Like this one, though it may seem unfair to the employees who are bound by the ruling.The case is ABM Industry Groups, LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:26 am
... as the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:34 am
  On appeal, the petitioner claims that the Appellate Court improperly applied this court's precedent in Phillips v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds that plaintiff has a case against Barton under the New York City Human Rights Law.The case is Phillips v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by Jon Hyman
When a judicial opinion starts out with a quote such as this, it’s usually not a good sign for the defendant, unless you happen to be the United Auto Workers, the defendant in Phillips v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 8:31 pm
Bad things can happen to you when you manufacture and sell counterfeit goods. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
Phillips of Washington, D.C., will argue for the petitioner, and Roy T. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:00 pm by Daily Record Staff
Civil procedure — Writ of habeas corpus — Challenge to conviction’s legality Michael Dorsey, Jr. appeals the denial, by the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:10 pm
Think it's easy to litigate a case behind bars? [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 11:32 am
You don't typically see -- indeed, I don't think I've ever seen -- the Ninth Circuit publish an order granting an extension of time to file respondent's brief. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 1:02 pm
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck.Even if the parties may think (or may even say) they're not in a dating relationship, if that's what they're in fact in, the trial court may permissibly so find. [read post]