Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 341 - 360
of 177,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
The Plaintiff admitted that she only saw the defendant's vehicle a split second before the impact. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 10:24 am
Earlier this month, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower state court decision, allowing the plaintiff in a product liability lawsuit to proceed toward trial despite the defendant’s challenges to the plaintiff’s expert’s testimony. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 9:01 am
When defendant requested plaintiff to turn over the rest of her Facebook content (presumably to find other like-pictures which would undermine plaintiff’s case), plaintiff sought a protective order. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
A plaintiff’s failure to present an expert witness may result in a case’s premature dismissal. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:52 am
The trial court agreed and dismissed the plaintiff’s case. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 1:13 pm
The plaintiff filed a personal injury lawsuit against the uninsured driver, and a jury returned a general verdict in the plaintiff’s favor for $157,400. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 11:22 am
The circuit court awarded no damages, concluding that the plaintiff’s evidence of lost wages was legally insufficient, and there was no evidence that the plaintiff’s medical bills were fair, reasonable, and necessary. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:06 am
After two defense wins earlier in the month January ended a little brighter for patent plaintiffs, with a Texarkana jury in Judge David Folsom's court returning a verdict of infringement in Ion v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
” In an article published in the IADC Product Liability Committee Newsletter (February 2012), "No Other Alternative: Challenging Plaintiff's Proof of Reasonable Alternative Design", Elbert S. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
” In an article published in the IADC Product Liability Committee Newsletter (February 2012), "No Other Alternative: Challenging Plaintiff's Proof of Reasonable Alternative Design", Elbert S. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:21 am
In addition, [plaintiff's] expert has only discussed infringement based on the corrected . . . patent claims. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Due to the severity of the injury, the plaintiff’s finger was amputated. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:41 am
The photos apparently showed no damage to the plaintiff’s vehicle. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:41 am
The photos apparently showed no damage to the plaintiff’s vehicle. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:25 am
As a result, the plaintiff’s case was dismissed by the court. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:43 am
The defendant responded in one of three ways: (1) offering the counter-anchor that, if any damages are awarded, they should only be $50,000; (2 ignoring the plaintiff’s damage demand; or (3) attacking plaintiff’s demand as outrageous and using this characterization to argue that plaintiff’s entire case was not credible. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:49 am
The district court held that the plaintiff's expert's testimony ran afoul of the Federal Circuit's decision in Lucent Technologies v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 3:24 pm
The court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the supervisor’s motivation to lie to protect her job was sufficient to create a disputed fact and affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff’s case. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 9:37 am
In addition, the court considers the plaintiff’s right to be compensated fully for any damages caused by the defendant’s acts or omissions. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:44 pm
When defendant learned of plaintiff’s side hustle, it claimed plaintiff’s project infringed defendant’s copyright rights. [read post]
