Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)"
Results 341 - 360
of 69,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2016, 11:54 am
In today’s case (Ben-Yosef v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 7:16 am
"[Plaintiff] contends that it made reasonable efforts to discover [defendant's Chinese manufacturer's] process for producing azoxystrobin technical, but that it has been thwarted by [defendant's] lack of full cooperation and its inability to get information from [the manufacturer]. . . . [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
See Luo v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 10:46 am
The plaintiff in this case claims that the defendant’s takedown notices got it permanently banned in Reddit. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:45 pm
In today’s case (Dzumhur v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Darrow v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Unpersuaded by the defendant’s argument, the court granted the plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:00 am
Cooley v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:00 am
Cooley v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
In Shefts v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:39 am
Williams v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 8:32 am
But Justice Kagan, writing for four dissenters, said this: That thrice-asserted view [that the defendant’s offer mooted the plaintiff’s individual claims] is wrong, wrong, and wrong again. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Plaintiff, a former detective with the New York City Police Department [NYPD], commenced this action against the defendants [Defendants] alleging a number of tort claims and claims under the New York City Human Rights Law and alleged that Defendants' conduct forced him to retire from the NYPD.Citing General Municipal Law §50-e and Umeh v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Plaintiff, a former detective with the New York City Police Department [NYPD], commenced this action against the defendants [Defendants] alleging a number of tort claims and claims under the New York City Human Rights Law and alleged that Defendants' conduct forced him to retire from the NYPD.Citing General Municipal Law §50-e and Umeh v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 8:13 am
This uncontroverted evidence establishes a nexus between plaintiff's delay and [defendant's] expenditures related to [the accused products]. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:45 am
§ 285 after plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its action following the PTAB's invalidation of its patent during a CBM review because plaintiff's litigation positions were not exceptional. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
In the case, Jimenez v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, the plaintiff was injured while running on a treadmill in one of the defendant’s gym locations. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
Following a bench trial, the court found that defendants did not infringe plaintiff's intraluminal stent graft patent under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
A rule allowing a class action to become moot “simply because the defendant has sought to ‘buy off’ the individual private claims of the named plaintiffs” before the named plaintiffs have a chance to file a motion for class certification would thus contravene Rule 23’s core concern: the aggregation of similar, small, but otherwise doomed claims. [read post]
