Search for: "Polk v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2009, 3:06 pm
United States, which allowed a company to be held criminally liable any time an employee commits a crime intended to help the company. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 9:55 am
Anthony Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 11:21 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
He died 3 days later of the injuries at the age of 47. * 1599: Nanda Bayin, a Burman king, reportedly laughed to death when informed, by a visiting Italian merchant, that “Venice was a free state without a king. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 8:32 am
In case of State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 2:58 pm
Sechrest v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 4:27 am
" Quoting its landmark en banc ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Some academic critics of Roe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 1:56 pm
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 5:12 am
In Kessler v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
Status Conference, US v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Polk, No. 072425 Sentence of fifteen years and eight months incarceration for attempting to produce child pornography is affirmed where: 1) there was no gross disproportionality between the fifteen-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment established by 18 U.S.C. section 2251(e) and the offense of which the defendant was convicted; and 2) the defendant's Eighth Amendment challenge failed. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 7:10 pm
In late July, Delaware Vice Chancellor Noble issued a decision in Ryan v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 5:05 am
One of those cases was Polk v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:36 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
The move by Simpson Thacher follows that by Davis Polk & Wardwell, which last month hired former federal prosecutor Ronnie Abrams to fill a similar role. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
"Plaintiff has stated a cause of action for legal malpractice by alleging that "but for" defendant's failure to prepare and procure documents necessary to provide him with a first-priority security interest, he would have been able to recover the amounts owed to him by the defaulting borrower (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
“In this legal malpractice action, plaintiffs are unable to demonstrate that they would have succeeded in the underlying personal injury action "but for" defendants' conduct (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434, 866 N.E.2d 1033, 834 N.Y.S.2d 705 [2007]). [read post]
