Search for: "Ponder v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:35 am
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Sorenen looks at last week’s cert grant in McKinney v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:47 am
It has been held in Green v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Okay, so Martinez v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:35 am
The case is Florida v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:29 pm
At issue in the just-appealed case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
Neil ponders the legal protection of voice creations. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
United States cases and its more recent plurality opinion in Chavez v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
She stated that these discriminatory policies were also in violation of article 14 of the Convention. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:15 am
Ponder that. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
A finding of infringement is a finding that a monopoly granted by the state is to be enforced. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
That principle was established by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 8:25 am
(Vector One) Why Crisis Maps Can Be Risky When There Is Political Unrest (Technology Review) The Crowdsourcing Detective: Crisis, Deception and Intrigue (iRevolution) Law Enforcement/National Security Courts grapple with use of GPS technology in criminal cases (The Olympian) The Government's Brief in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:39 am
The ABA Journal is reporting that Justice Sonia Sotomayor told the managing partner of Sydney Austin's Washington, D.C. office, Carter Phillips, to "slow down from the rhetoric", as Phillips began his argument before the High Court on behalf of the State of California in the Schwarznegger -v- Plata prison overcrowding case.Justice Sotomayor also had a series of hard questions for California's appellate attorney such as how his client could possibly… [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:27 am
" is a golden oldie that has been pondered by Philosophy 101 students since time immemorial.Perhaps the New Hampshire Supreme Court should tackle the question, having just ruled in Professional Firefighters of New Hampshire ("PFFNH") v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm
United States patents are generally territorial. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 8:31 am
See United States v. [read post]
