Search for: "Power v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 341 - 360
of 825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2015, 9:47 am
The case now before the Court turns on what Congress meant when it authorized the Internal Revenue Service to grant tax credits to help pay for health insurance for lower-income individuals who cannot afford to pay for their health benefits. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:02 am
The Internal Revenue Service interprets Internal Revenue Code § 6039D as obligating employers sponsoring health plans that violate these and certain other federal health plan rules to self-identify, self-report, and self-assess and pay excise and other taxes due under the Internal Revenue Code as a result of this non-compliance. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:50 pm
Carroll v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
Iowa Dept. of Revenue, Dkt. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:22 am
Gutierrez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
This summer, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in the Google Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:40 am
At that time, we sent a letter to the Internal Revenue Service asking the federal tax agency to look into the matter. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 7:08 am
Buying Kosher or Halal products doesn’t result in a tax break, even if you’re doing it in the name of a power higher than the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am
States may use this latest aid to: Respond to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, which includes aid to households, businesses, and impacted industries, and is likely to include covering the compensation of state health and public safety officials and current unemployment benefit claims, consistent with Treasury’s guidance on the Coronavirus Relief Fund, which was dedicated to similar purposes; Supplement the pay of essential workers; Pay for general government… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Antonin is a trial and appellate lawyer practicing in Toronto with a focus on international litigation and arbitration. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
USPS v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:42 pm
In Tannen v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
Two revenue officers contacted taxpayers directly without the required consent of the taxpayers’ power of attorney, one contact representative harassed or abused taxpayers, and one contact representative used obscene or profane language with taxpayers. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:40 pm
The District Court also cited Stinson Estate v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:40 pm
The bad news of “Hackl III” is Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Michel V. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:43 pm
See Solis v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:44 am
The USF collects fees from telecommunications providers and uses those revenues to support various programs that promote access to telecom services for low-income consumers, rural areas, schools, libraries, and health-care providers. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
In any FRAND dispute in a court of law, it would have to be considered that cars are in use for far longer periods than smartphones, and that car makers generate incremental revenues from data services over the years. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) director was unlawful. [read post]
