Search for: "Powers v. Planned Parenthood"
Results 341 - 360
of 434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am
” Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast features a discussion of Murr v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Wade and reaffirmed by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:21 am
As solicitor general, he filed a friend-of-the-court brief for the Bush administration in the 1992 case Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Respect Life of South San Francisco (“Petitioners”) challenged the City of South San Francisco’s approval of a conditional use permit (“CUP”) for a proposed Planned Parenthood clinic at an existing office building in the city’s downtown. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Respect Life of South San Francisco (“Petitioners”) challenged the City of South San Francisco’s approval of a conditional use permit (“CUP”) for a proposed Planned Parenthood clinic at an existing office building in the city’s downtown. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Abortion Planned Parenthood Ass’n of Utah v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
The Supreme Court had just the month before reaffirmed that precedent by a six-to-three margin in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
Wade (1973) (citing Jacobson); Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
See from post-Marshall Plan Europe spillover to developing nations; changed how development and IP were understood. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
” Given that, the plurality opinion of three Justices in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Wade and its companion 1992 decision Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The petitioners argued that there were unusual circumstances due to “the inherently noxious and controversial nature of a portion of Planned Parenthood’s services” which would cause significant environme [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
Our new favorite acronym, NHRtL, looks to have picked up a third relist in its attempt to obtain documents regarding a grant to Planned Parenthood from the Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
Bruen, Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:10 pm
” has become a rallying cry of conservatives, who despaired when Souter joined Justices Anthony Kennedy and Sandra Day O’Connor in a plurality opinion in the 1992 decision Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
There are no per se rights of parenthood at Common Law. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Issues: (1) Whether the Federal Communications Commission’s assumption of gatekeeper power over new methods of communication, “in the most important place [] for the exchange of views[,] … the ‘vast democratic forums of the Internet,’” violates the First Amendment; (2) whether the radical reinterpretation of the Communications Act of 1934 by the FCC is entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
