Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
See Indictment, United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:06 pm
One of the most famous censorship cases to land in the courts is United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 10:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
The United States Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal by Sony Music, Vivendi, Warner Music and EMI, in Sony Music v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:44 am
Costco v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:31 am
Friend, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously agreed that a corporations “principal place of business,” for purposes of determining whether federal courts have diversity jurisdiction (that is, all parties on one side of the versus (“v”) sign are from states different from all parties on the opposite side) to hear a case. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:36 pm
The parties in the case are engaged in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of bottled water in the Southeastern United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:09 am
VIP PRODUCTS LLC (Opinion, United States Supreme Court) Agencies issue fina... [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 12:16 pm
(Opinion, United States Supreme Court)... [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:04 am
Georgie Court of Appeals Reverses Leggett v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
Class representatives and their counsel in the Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation have won another initial round in their suit alleging that Chinese vitamin C manufacturers conspired to fix prices and to limit the output of vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
District Judge in Seattle ruled that transporting and reselling unaltered “Trader Joe’s” branded products in Canada does not give rise to a lawsuit for trademark infringement in the United States under U.S. trademark laws. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm
2011 will surely go down as the Year of the Class Action in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm
Case: M Waikiki v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:55 am
In Price v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Thank you to "an anonymous friend" for bringing this case to my attention.In the context of a restitution motion, in United States of America v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:30 am
The second is the potential for increased price regulation on pharmaceuticals in the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 11:18 am
In State of California v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:26 am
The case of Marine Travelift, Inc. v. [read post]
