Search for: "Providence Health & Services, Appellant V. Department Of Health, Respondent"
Results 341 - 354
of 354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
For the same reason, the similar arguments made in several briefs filed by amici curiae are of no aid to the Masons. establishing their appellate standing to assert a claim of denial of equal protection of the law. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:27 am
Committee for Occupational Safety and Health v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
02/08/2008
Appellate Ruling in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:12 am
Alternatively, they claim that DCS negligently provided them with services, thus impeding their ability to re-acquire custody of their children. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
See Amicus Curiae Brief of the United States of America in Support of Defendants/Respondents, Dowhal v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
In fact, as was set forth in the OCA's answer to the petition, the health insurance cause of action must be dismissed for failure to join a necessary party because the real party in interest is the president of the Civil Service Commission, who negotiates health insurance packages on behalf of the Judiciary. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Service are affirmed over claims that: 1) the Wild Bird Act does not apply to captive-bred birds; 2) the Act is unconstitutionally vague because it does not define the term personal pet; and 3) the jury instruction given by the trial court was incorrect. [read post]
17 May 2007, 3:01 am
New York State Department of Health, respondents NEW YORK COUNTYLegal Profession Bankruptcy Filing Would Have Tolled Medical Malpractice Action; Law Firm Denied Dismissal Kremen v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:59 am
Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services ORANGE COUNTYFamily Law Privately Retained Attorney Denied Vacatur Of Motion Denying His Representation of Child Matter of B.M. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 1:49 am
Brooks, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Respondent): Cole N. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:09 pm
Health Net, Inc., "Wachtel II", 2006 U.S. [read post]
