Search for: "Public Citizen v. Kennedy" Results 341 - 360 of 920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2011, 8:02 am by Adam Chandler
Gore, Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
"   The state's Public Records Act affirms that just as legislator's votes are a matter of public record, citizens have "the right to know which of their fellow citizens are sponsoring referendums and initiatives. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, in State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy with the decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:46 am by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy was Citizen United's author. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Kennedy participating. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm by Corey Brettschneider
Corey Brettschneider & Nelson TebbeLast week, the Court heard arguments in Walker v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Chief Justice Marshall’s beautifully crafted opinion, in turn, provided a template for Justice Kennedy’s opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:50 pm by David Lat
Of course, experts in this area — including some Obama-supporting liberals — told us that Citizens United wasn’t that big a deal.)Thanks to last year’s juicy Obama v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:12 am by Deepak Gupta
One of my colleagues here at Public Citizen Litigation Group, Allison Zieve, helped to secure this important victory in the fight against broad theories of preemption, which are used to deny consumers access to the civil justice system. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:25 am by Anna Christensen
ACSblog reports that during the recent Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference, Justice Kennedy lamented the slow pace of judicial confirmations, urging the public to “understand that the excellence of the federal judiciary is at risk. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]