Search for: "Query v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It’s disturbing, to say the least.Perhaps the United States will never be Gilead. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:51 pm by Lisa Baird
The District Court has now issued its order and granted Amarin the injunction it requested, in what surely will be considered a landmark ruling regarding the First Amendment and truthful, non-misleading off-label promotion, alongside the Second Circuit’s United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 6:28 am
The rights protected by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 11:41 am by India McKinney
This is a particularly problematic situation that could cost someone entrance to the United States based on, for instance, their own or a friend’s political opinions—as happened to a Palestinian Harvard student when his social media account was reviewed when coming to the U.S. to start his semester. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 11:41 am by India McKinney
This is a particularly problematic situation that could cost someone entrance to the United States based on, for instance, their own or a friend’s political opinions—as happened to a Palestinian Harvard student when his social media account was reviewed when coming to the U.S. to start his semester. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Arguments of the United States Assistant to the Solicitor General Benjamin Snyder argued for the United States in support of neither party. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
As such, relevant queries were raised but without a conclusive answer for the time being:Can virtual designs be protected under Article 3 of the Community Design Regulation (CDR)? [read post]
2 May 2021, 9:59 am by Mark Latham
Did any lawyers for the United States approve the timing of the condemnation action? [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:24 am by Sheldon Toplitt
So-called "symbolic speech" cases involve conduct through which the actor intends to convey a specific message and the audience reasonably understands the intended message.The concept is familiar to media law students, but apparently is lost on United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Judge Raymond Jackson, who last week ruled in Bland v. [read post]