Search for: "Query v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 5:47 am
How much of this targeting appears to come from countries which have an MLAT with the United States? [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:43 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
United States decision to reach the conclusion that the district court’s failure to mention “prejudice” in its dismissal order does not bar a second proceeding. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
United States Cellular Corporation, 1-14-cv-00903 (DED March 22, 2016, Order) (Robinson, J.) [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:49 am
Then, in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
” And Director of the FBI, James Comey, testified regarding background checks for Syrian refugees, stating that the United States “could only query what [36] [it] ha[s] collected,” but that the United States has far less in its databases with respect to Syrian refugees than Iraqi refugees. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
It has been a week since the Court announced that it would review United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:13 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am
To retroactivity and fair notice broadly, the brief argues, “no accused could have had notice that the laws of war applied in Yemen in 2000”—and in fact, “the President and Congress’s pronouncements that the United States was not at war in Yemen provided notice that the laws of w [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am
UNITED STATES OF … and this one : Another Marvel in the Inbox – – Crossroads – WordPress.com :-p [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:38 am
On their side was a 1979 Supreme Court ruling (Smith v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 5:40 am
Garre, a former United States Solicitor General now representing the University of Texas, as a kind of reductio ad absurdum. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 12:21 pm
But we’ll never convince judges or elected officials to respect the privacy rights of those outside the United States if we can’t convince them that Americans’ privacy is worth protecting, too. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:29 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
In this declaration, Patterson explained that the database at issue `consisted of telecommunications metadata obtained from United States telecommunications providers pursuant to administrative subpoenas served upon the service providers under the provisions of 21 U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:35 am
V. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am
They also explored how the United States can strike a “balance between privacy, security and the economic imperatives driving innovation” among other topics. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:57 pm
United States District Judge Richard Leon issued the order in Klayman v. [read post]
