Search for: "RICHARD M. JUSTICE" Results 341 - 360 of 2,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2007, 10:55 am by Gideon's Guardians
(Anonymous' comments are in red)Anonymous had two beefs with the outcome of Richard Glawson's first trial: First, that the mistrial appeared to reward Glawson for his bad behavior. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:12 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Richard M. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:30 am by Richard Murphy
Richard Murphy There is something silly about Supreme Court decisions in which five justices explain that the conventional tools of statutory interpretation—e.g., legislative intent, objective textual meaning, and judicial rules for discerning and applying them—plainly indicate that a statute means A but the other four justices deploy the same tools to explain that the statute plainly means B. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 7:55 pm
I’m not sure if Posner’s opinion strengthens the dissenting opinion written by Justice Stevens or the opinion authored by Justice Breyer concurring in judgement with the majority. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:51 am by Justin Marceau
” Other justices also expressed dismay at the proposal of law professor Richard Re, who wrote a deft amicus brief arguing for the complete abolition of the Marks rule that received considerable attention during the argument. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:46 pm by Derek Bambauer
Scalia responded by pulling rank: I’m a Supreme Court justice and you’re an appellate judge, so don’t tug on Superman’s cape. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:44 am
According to media reports, the Ontario Government is suing convicted former Toronto Police officer, Richard Wills, to recover $1.2 M of public money spent on his "preposterous" defence of first degree murder charges arising from the death of his long-time lover, Linda Mariani. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:20 pm by Dan Ernst
Friedman, Louise Campbell, Richard Bensel, and Michael Bernstein after the jump.Read more » [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, concluding that he “still think[s] the government’s surplusage argument is pretty silly, but I’m no longer so sure the government’s reading creates an absurd amount of surplusage. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Seung Min Kim and Robert Barnes report that “Kavanaugh’s years-old remarks questioning the landmark ruling that forced President Richard M. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 12:47 pm
I’m delighted to be guest-blogging about my forthcoming article, “The Due Process Exclusionary Rule. [read post]