Search for: "ROGERS v. BROWN" Results 341 - 360 of 516
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
In contrast, Lord Scott, Neuberger and Brown argued that D2 should have been liable: if the aim was to punish the victim then the method was of less relevance than the purpose. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  The minority (Lords Phillips, Roger and Brown) went further, finding that this lack of causation should have prevented a cause of action accruing at all. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
The week wraps up with continuing coverage of this week’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm by Patrick
It won’t surprise long-time readers to learn that I approve of Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:08 pm by David Bernstein
Here’s Obama in June 2005, opposing the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown to the D.C. [read post]