Search for: "Rands v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2024, 11:52 am
(Philip Wasielewski and William Courtney, 'Bolstering Ukraine's Irregular War Against Russia,' Rand (18 March 2024)) Beyond hypotheticals, conflicts in Ukraine, Nagorno-Karabakh, and Yemen show that drones are quickly becoming a central area for development and innovation in warfare at all levels of technological sophistication. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Rand J. did not require the presence of an evil or of evil effects in the Margarine Reference. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The mandatory payment of fees under the Rand formula was a claimed violation of his s. 2(b) rights. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:05 am by JB
As the Court explained in Bartnicki v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 10:28 pm
The report discusses various strategies to mitigate hold-up, including the use of disclosure requirements and “reasonable and nondiscriminatory” (RAND) licensing terms. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Shoemaker, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Sanctuary Law and a Strong Anglo-Saxon State? [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm by Keith Szeliga and Katie Calogero
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  The new school of political economy that he created at the University of Virginia was “meant to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown [v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
Rand Paul’s willingness to support Kavanaugh after voicing concerns about the judge’s approach to Fourth Amendment digital privacy issues “suggests that in his private meeting with Kavanaugh, the SCOTUS nominee signaled his willingness to take a new view of the Fourth Amendment in light of [the Supreme Court’s recent decision in] Carpenter [v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm by Florian Mueller
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Elizabeth Allan, Scott R. Anderson
These latter procedures, however, have been constitutionally suspect since the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
The entire system, according to Rand, had to be accepted or rejected. [read post]