Search for: "Read v. People"
Results 341 - 360
of 21,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 1:46 pm
No way a jury was going to believe it.Plus it let the prosecution get in the defendant's prior gun conviction.Next time your criminal defense client insists upon testifying, have 'em read this opinion. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or consent to… [read post]
12 May 2025, 3:56 pm
(Assuming you don't get nailed for conspiracy, of course.)I also learned something else reading this opinion. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:46 am
. - When you read the first eight pages or so of the opinion -- which recounts the details of a large number of gang-related murders -- it sounds like the Wild West out in Garden Grove, Westminster, etc. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 1:17 pm
After reading the facts, I understand why.The way the facts begin in the opinion is something you see occasionally:"Defendant and Jane dated for several months, beginning in 2015. [read post]
23 May 2019, 2:58 pm
When you read all the things that Mr. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:33 am
Sometimes, in the middle of an opinion, you read a paragraph that just makes everything else make sense.So when Justice Nicholson says, in the context of whether it was proper to conduct a joint trial of both of defendant's alleged crimes:"Second, neither case was more prejudicial than the other or unusually likely to inflame the jury. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:20 pm
I'm not going to ask anyone to read this 100-page plus opinion. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
Davis v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
People v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:34 pm
Really, I do.But I'll offer the following rule, which although not categorical, is at least subject to a very heavy presumption:If you have more than 50 animals as pets, you're doing something wrong.I make this observation after reading this case. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 2:00 pm
Let me give you a running commentary of my thought process as I read this one:"On the morning of March 19, 2006, defendant was partying in his house with C.G., B.M., and two other gentlemen. . . . [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
History Through the Eyes of Everyday People. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:06 am
Several of the papers in this series will be of interest to Turtle Talk readers, including a unique analysis of Lyng v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 2:50 pm
., to defraud people. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Parsing through all these citations while you're reading is a major hassle. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:54 pm
Read the opinion for more. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 8:44 am
This year marks six decades since the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Gideon v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm
Some people who have been reading this blog know that I have been waiting for the decision in Evans v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
Which s/he does, reading the relevant CALCRIM instruction.And, of course, the relevant CALCRIM instruction accurately states the law. [read post]
