Search for: "Reade v. C. I. R"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2014, 11:37 am
McDonald v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 4:14 am
Trading Technologies Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., No. 04 C 5312, Slip Op. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:04 am
., Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., No 04 C 5312, Slip Op. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
Defense Attorney: Valentine C. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
In contrast to its decision in Zaratzian, the subject of yesterday’s blog post, the Second Department, in Eagar v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
R. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:05 am
Unknown c/o Dora Marks, FA0506000490083 (Nat. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:22 am
The latter part of the presentation covered recent cases on medicines regulation, focussing on R(Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWCA Civ 1311 (although this English Court of Appeal decision was handed down on 21 December 2015, it may have escaped your radar due to seasonal festivities and/or the mad rush to tie up loose ends before the Christmas vacation...) [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
I shall divide my study into two parts: the first one, mainly descriptive, where I shall present the book under analysis; and the second one, more evaluative, where I shall offer a critical review of Sunstein’s work. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:48 am
Abbe R. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:00 am
I've known this since I was shocked to read Walkovszky v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 11:09 am
As now permitted by Gov.Bar R. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:22 am
See Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0) Rule I .2(c). [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:51 am
That scholar is Allison C. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
But if the 2011 SEC CF Guidance was a wake-up call for public companies, the 2018 SEC Guidance is a resounding fire alarm — and is a must-read for any C-suite executive at a public company. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:00 am
Gutchess 1998 Irrevocable Trust v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am
Second,in Harrison v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, the Court of Appeal held that the right only extended to those person who cared for children who would otherwise be compelled to leave the country.Finally, in R (Sanneh) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 793 (Admin), the Administrative Court held that the provision of subsistence payments and accommodation under s.17, Children Act 1989 were sufficient to ensure that an individual would not be compelled to leave the UK.In R… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Some years ago – never mind how long precisely – having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me on TV, I thought I would commence reading some patent judgments and see a bit of the workings of the law.Chief among my motives was the overwhelming idea of the great whale of a judgment itself. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:35 am
R 1/08 of 15 July 2008, point 2.1 of the reasons, and R 13/12 of 14 November 2012, point 2.5 of the reasons). [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
For more on written transfer agreements, read the merit decision in Capital Care Network of Toledo v. [read post]
