Search for: "Render v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 18,908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: takings: Sony rootkit is installed, and you’re not allowed to remove it because of the power of the state; similar to Loretto v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am by Will Baude
Trump is indeed disqualified by Section Three from future office as a matter of federal constitutional law; and that this renders him ineligible for inclusion on the state primary ballot for election to that office as a matter of Colorado state law. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Yuval Shany
This renders its case on the merits according to some commentators something of a long shot. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 1:20 pm by Caitlin Truelove
Once this process is complete, North Carolina recognizes that judgment as if it were rendered in this state. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
LSE Media Blog has published an article arguing that UK election debates are rendered rushed and haphazard due to the absence of a governing body or clear guidance. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Accordingly, the court rejected the County’s position that the potential for vicarious liability under FEHA rendered Section 533 inapplicable to the damages award in the underlying FEHA lawsuit. [read post]