Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding Jurisdiction" Results 341 - 360 of 1,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2022, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
More questionable yet was the court's insinuation that Wood was at least partially responsible for the troubling events that occurred at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021—a topic not addressed in the Rule to Show Cause. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:19 am
BONA FIDE Truthfully, honestly and without deceit BRIEF A legal document presented to the court BURDEN OF PROOF One spouse must prove any claims made against the opposing spouse to the court. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:09 pm
Ideally, the Staff Attorney will have: A minimum of five years of federal court litigation experience and membership in one State Bar; Superb legal research, writing and analytical skills and strong interpersonal and communication skills; Ability and willingness to travel occasionally in the United States and internationally; Experience with international law and human rights cases, including the Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victim Protection Act is desirable;… [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am by Alex Manevich
Except as provided for in this Act, a foreign state is immune from the jurisdiction of any court in Canada. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
”) The government responded by filing another brief on behalf of “the United States” authorized by the Solicitor General. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 7:28 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
At a high level, the Administration’s intentions repeated throughout the Executive Order and the Fact Sheet are to: protect consumers, investors, and businesses in the United States; protect United States and global financial stability and mitigate systemic risk; mitigate the illicit finance and national security risks posed by misuse of digital assets; reinforce United States leadership in the global financial system and in technological… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:34 pm by Arianna Morseau
  Responsibilities include: providing liaison services to water rights settlement implementation and negotiation teams nation-wide; briefing policy-level leaders within the Department; facilitating meetings focused on negotiations with various parties to settlements including Tribes, States, and other governmental and non-governmental organizations; conducting research and analyses on issues related to Indian water right and related legal and policy matters; and other… [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Janus wins in court, public sector union members will still have no say regarding which union represents their bargaining unit. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The CourtStanding to Challenge US Wiretapping Law Denied: Clapper, Director of National Intelligence et al v Amnesty International USA et al On 26 February 2013, the United States Supreme Court (USSC) ((568 US) (2013)) upheld the federal law that enables the government to perform surveillance on Americans’ phone and email communications with people outside the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:35 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Occupational health and safety changes Changes were made to Alberta employers’ responsibilities in relation to joint health and safety committees and safety representatives. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:10 am by Larkin Reynolds
Circuit suggested that the jurisdictional question was still open with respect to a detainee who claimed he was held at Bagram specifically in order to evade process that would be available to him at Guantánamo or in the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:44 am by Eugene Volokh
After hearing the motion, the Court directed the file be sent to the United States Attorney for investigation. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:58 pm by Anthony Gaughan
The United States today is in unchartered terrain as a nation. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-18Issue(s): Whether, when a trial judge’s restriction on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness is challenged on appeal as a violation of the Confrontation Clause, the proper standard of review is de novo or abuse of discretion.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the United States Army Defense Appellate DivisionAmicus… [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
This case, at its most elementary level, is about assigning responsibility for the swirl of air pollution that does not respect the boundaries of states, especially in the eastern part of the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am by MBettman
There’s not one word in the state’s appellate brief or jurisdictional memo that tells this Court that there was any problem with the substance of Mr. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:20 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
He stated that he mistakenly marked “yes” in response to a Georgia driver’s license application question “Are you a U.S. [read post]