Search for: "Ridings v. Ridings"
Results 341 - 360
of 4,757
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
” State of Ohio v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
The case of Ladislav Zdút v EUIPO concerned a trademark for a figurative mark for the brand "NEHERA" (EUTM 11794112), which was applied for and registered in 2013-2014, including a number of different types of goods such as clothing and footwear. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
The case of Ladislav Zdút v EUIPO concerned a trademark for a figurative mark for the brand "NEHERA" (EUTM 11794112), which was applied for and registered in 2013-2014, including a number of different types of goods such as clothing and footwear. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 1:41 pm
Likewise, in Whitman Saddle, the design patent at issue was directed to a “design for a riding saddle,” and the prior art used in comparison was also a riding saddle. 148 U.S. 674 (1893). [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 9:08 am
” Johnson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
Red Bull v Monster[2]demonstrated recently it is possible – however, if the later mark is not confusingly similar to the earlier mark, and the Opponent cannot prove that the Applicant intended to ride on its coat-tails, then the change in economic behaviour will depend on an actual image transfer (from RED DAWG to RED BULL, or HOUSE OF ZANA to ZARA). [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
Red Bull v Monster[2]demonstrated recently it is possible – however, if the later mark is not confusingly similar to the earlier mark, and the Opponent cannot prove that the Applicant intended to ride on its coat-tails, then the change in economic behaviour will depend on an actual image transfer (from RED DAWG to RED BULL, or HOUSE OF ZANA to ZARA). [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 12:33 pm
They want to drive a bike revolution by providing participants with bikes and teaching them how to ride and repair them. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 2:44 pm
Cotton Oil Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 9:44 am
After an unsuccessful attempt with the EUIPO examination division and a subsequent appeal to the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal (the board), earlier this summer this held (Speculative Product Design LLC V EUIPO, R 503/2021-2), among other things, that the mark was devoid of any distinctive character. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
Graham v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm
You fight it when they say free riding or you don’t: say that free riding isn’t relevant to economic considerations v. saying tu quoque. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:40 am
In the post-Roe v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:08 am
., sports, swimming, horseback riding, and diving. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 10:04 am
Busk, and Thole v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
—Whitney Tilson _______________________________________________1Hubbell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:36 am
Facts: This case (Saulsbery v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:22 pm
But then our facts in Barnes v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 28 July 2022, there were hearings in ABC and Others v London Borough of Lambeth and SJU and Others v London Borough of Lambeth before Nicklin J and in Nicolaisen v Nicolaisen before Jay J. [read post]
