Search for: "Risk v. Wells Market Service, Inc." Results 341 - 360 of 1,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
GuestKat Peter Ling discusses the Opinion of AG Pitruzzella in case C-688/17 concerning the intriguing question of whether a “launch at risk” (i.e. the commercialization of a product without first suing for cancellation of any relevant patents prior to market entry) should exclude any compensation in the event that an IP right is wrongly issued. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Many, at best, pay lip service to the Arthur Andersen fee factors, or at least some of them. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
Gear Inc v Hi-Tech Sports plc [1992] FSR 121, Morritt J stated "…it seems to me that 'reason to believe' must involve the concept of knowledge of facts from which a reasonable man [person] would arrive at the relevant belief. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
Well under Texas law, solely managed community property (including wages) of the non-debtor spouse is not property of bankruptcy estate. [read post]
California Classification Laws: In addition to staying on the right side of the FTC, companies should also be careful to stay on the right side of the recent California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 7:36 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The risks of talcum powder exposure are particularly troubling because the product was marketed as safe and healthy for use from infancy into adulthood. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Aruba Networks Posted by Brian Broughman (Indiana University), on Thursday, February 7, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Market efficiency, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions [read post]