Search for: "Robert R King" Results 341 - 360 of 1,042
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2015, 5:37 am
Cruz's appointees will "not act like philosopher kings. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:37 am by Pearl Griffin
It seems like a broken record, but the problems with patient care in Illinois nursing homes persist. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
Ellis) and me; Daniel Lyne and Ted Folkman of Murphy & King (and, in Ted’s case, of Letters Blogatory: The Blog of International Judicial Assistance) were kind enough to agree to be our pro bono counsel, for which I’m very grateful. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:36 am
A former clerk for Chief Justice John Roberts on the Supreme Court and then-Judge Michael McConnell on the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
There’s much else in Stevens’s remarks that should interest court watchers, including praise for Chief Justice John Roberts (citing King v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
  At Washington Examiner, Robert King reports on a cert. petition filed by a group of religious schools. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:33 am by Sarena
Similarly, King took his protagonist, Paul Sheldon, and locked him in a room with nothing to occupy his mind but his jailer, Annie Wilkes. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by Donna Ballman
Find out by reading Robert Fitzpatrick's A Sham or Just Self-Serving? [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 5:32 pm
The intra-family litigation began after Robert's death when WK sued his mother and sister as executors of Robert's estate, asserting, inter alia, claims of ownership to Robert's interests in the family businesses. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 7:32 am
The first was his draft preamble for the Virginia constitution that contained a list of grievances, which was strikingly similar to the first group of charges against the King that ended up on the Declaration. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:48 pm by Bill Marler
As his brother, Robert, recalls, he was a “gentle, soft, loving person. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:41 am
I also agree with him that the principal problem with Chief Justice Roberts’ approach in King was that it adopted “purposivism,” but I see the Chief Justice justifying this deviation from plain meaning as a way to defer to the intent of the enacting Congress, as he did when he adopted the “saving construction” of the statute in NFIB. [read post]