Search for: "Rosen v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
Regulation Best Interest v. [read post]
9 Aug 2006, 4:56 pm
One of them is this:Perhaps the biggest strike against Rosen's argument is that it fails the Brown [v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:43 pm
" The whole case, Rosen v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:49 am
Fine twice challenged the statute at the New York Court of Appeals (People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329 [2001] and People v Daniels, 5 NY3d 738 [2005]), and at the Second Circuit (Brown v Greiner, 409 F3d 523 (2d Cir 2003]). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am
United States, and Mac’s Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Tags: Antitrust, CFIUS, Cross-border transactions, Disclosure, Distressed companies, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, Taxation Corporations are People Too (And They Should Act Like It) Posted by Kent Greenfield (Boston College), on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 … [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
By Brad Rosen, J.D. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 9:13 am
United States Hollis King Kentucky v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
Katz and Laura McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, March 29, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Board dynamics, Board performance, Board turnover, Boards of Directors, Diversity, Outside directors Independent Directors: New Class of 2018 Posted by Steve W. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Following the case of Giles v Rhind (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 118 (“Giles v Rhind”), Mr Justice Jay found that s 32(2) LA 1980 should be interpreted more widely, so as to cover “legal wrongdoing of any kind, giving rise to a right of action”. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:14 am
The defendant Horing Welikson & Rosen, P.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
And, in other news from the FJC, check out the most recent addition to the Center's unit to our Famous Federal Trials series, U.S. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:45 pm
See Lexmark v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
As a double-insult, 512(f) preempts related state law claims over abusive takedown notices, so it actually leaves victims worse off than if 512(f) didn’t exist by clearing out the field. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Norwitz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 2:16 pm
To see the entire opinion: Russel Rosen v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
Auth., 182 AD3d 970, 971; Matter of Brennan v New York State Dept. of Health, 159 AD3d 1250, 1252; Matter of Trotman v New York State Cts., 117 AD3d 1164, 1165; Matter of Littles v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 61 AD3d 1266, 1268; Matter of Cushion v Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 46 AD3d 1095, 1096; cf. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm
Rosen received a phone call on the afternoon the magistrate judge’s decision was filed. [read post]
