Search for: "Rules of Discipline v. Rules"
Results 341 - 360
of 4,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2007, 4:34 am
This great post explains the significance of the evidentiary rulings from the Sixth Circuit in Maday v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 7:32 am
The court also ruled that the prevailing employer was not precluded from recovering costs from the plaintiff employees (Garrison v. [read post]
24 May 2008, 5:56 pm
This was a key ruling, since Pacific Telesis permits unlimited sick leave, but counts sick leave against employees' attendance. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
↑ See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 3:12 am
Admitting evidence of prior disciplinary action taken against the charged partyOATH Index No. 2310/17Although the New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings Administrative Law Judge Joycelyn McGeachy-Kuls ruled that evidence of prior discipline is not admissible to prove an employee engaged in the charged misconduct, she said that prior disciplinary events may be used to rebut employee’s testimony that he was unaware of work rules. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:53 am
Coworkers not similarly disciplined. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
In UAlberta Pro-Life v Governors of the University of Alberta, (Alberta Ct. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:08 am
In Reinig v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
The complaint alleged that she “engaged in threatening, harassing or assaultive conduct” in violation of the code and that she engaged in “in conduct contrary to university rules related to the mortuary-science program, anatomy-laboratory course rules, and the rules listed on the anatomy-bequest-program disclosure form. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:37 pm
Loving v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
The Act's heavy reliance on Medicaid expansion also sought to save federal costs -- with disastrous results after NFIB v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:02 pm
” Ethical Rule 8.2 , which adopted what’s known as The New York Times Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:45 am
Mandatory retirement provisions within partnership agreements do not violate labour laws or human rights, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled today in McCormick v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 3:30 pm
Bd. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:16 am
Union v Misco, Inc., 484 US 29, at 38). [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 1:30 am
In M.A.L. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:53 pm
Counsel for Dis. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:02 am
Local No. 540 v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Accordingly, Coix filed the Coix Health, LLC v. [read post]
