Search for: "Rules of Evidence v. Rules" Results 341 - 360 of 59,309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2013, 4:30 am by Thalia Kruger
It is not every day that a Constitutional Court rules on a matter of evidence. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 11:31 am by John Floyd
But in 1911, the Court of Criminal Appeals carved out a narrow exception to this general rule in Battles v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:39 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Breaking news, a federal judge for the District of Columbia, issued a ruling in the lawsuit, National Venture Capital Association, et.al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 1:20 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Schauers] Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) reads as follows: (b) During an Inquiry into the Validity of a... [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 2:56 pm by Judge Bonnie Sudderth
 Ironically, the term “self-serving” doesn’t even appear in Rule 166a(c) (or any other rule of evidence, for that matter). [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals reversed a perjury conviction where the two-witness rule was not satisfied. blank">Gaffney v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 6:10 am
Dutton-Lainson Co., 2009 WL 398488 (Iowa App. 2009), reveals that there are significant differences between Federal Rule of Evidence 407 and Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.407. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
Supreme Court ruled Monday that prisoners can file federal civil-rights lawsuits seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence, a decision that gives inmates a new legal pathway to seek exoneration through scientific evidence, the Wall Street Journal yesterday reported. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 5:07 am
Some proposed additions to the Federal Rules of Evidence and draft jury instructions also are included in Part V. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 7:38 am by Steven Wildberger
In Turner [argument transcript], the court heard argument on the Brady rule [LII backgrounder], a rule requiring that prosecutors provide a criminal defendant with all evidence that is favorable or material to his defense, even if the defendant does not ask for it. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:45 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The trial court also found that severance was not required and the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence 411 under the circumstances presented. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:50 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States recently announced its ruling in the Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:51 am
The Third District Court of Appeal explained the reason for the rule in Cutler Ridge Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:38 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 404(a)(2) provides that Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is not admissible for the purpose of proving action in conformity therewith on a particular occasion, except:.... [read post]