Search for: "Russell v. U.s.*" Results 341 - 360 of 504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
  (Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents Mr. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:54 am by Kali Borkoski
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionReply of petitioner Cases involving lawyers from Goldstein & Russell (listed without regard to the likelihood of being granted): Pickering v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
California Court Declines to Follow Race Tires, Allows Taxation of eDiscovery Costs - bit.ly/IZoWhW (K&L Gates) Peck Wins By Submission; Parties Get Shot At Title Fight - bit.ly/Jfheio (eLessons Learned) Random Sample Calculations And My Prediction That 300,000 Lawyers Will Be Using Random Sampling By 2022 – bit.ly/IBIaZ5 (Ralph Losey) “Reasonableness” is Key When Assessing E-Discovery Efforts – bit.ly/IZp7d9 (Mike Hamilton) Reducing… [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:02 pm by Matthew Bush
The petition of the day is: Brown v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:41 am by Amy Howe
In Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:22 am by Joshua Matz
  (Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioners in this case.) [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by John Elwood
Espinosa, 11-84, previously relisted once after the Court called for a response (and in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., represents the respondent). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm by John Elwood
  (Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents Moncrieffe.) [read post]