Search for: "S B Mart Inc"
Results 341 - 360
of 767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 9:46 am
Relying on the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 8:31 pm
Notably, the Sixth Circuit relied extensively on Wal–Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm
With an eye to the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes, the court determined that the plaintiffs could not show anything more than a uniform policy by Hearst of utilizing unpaid internships. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:59 am
The Davis case provides guidance on a number of issues including the continued application of the decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:56 am
Gary Klausner, denied certification even though he preliminary concluded that “[t]he putative classes appear to meet the requisites of Rule 23(a),” including the “rigorous” commonality standard established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:00 am
Finally, the Court held: "If the district court again certifies a class under Rule 23(b)(3), it should calculate damages in light of the Supreme Court’s admonitions in Wal-Mart." [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:06 am
Citing the decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2010 WL 1790864, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 8:25 am
Even in other states, a plaintiff may prefer FLSA collective actions due to the lower standards for conditional certification and increasing difficulties in obtaining Rule 23 certification in the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:28 pm
Id. at 18 (citing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm
The cert petition in Ross (see SCOTUSblog page) raised the following issues: “(1) Whether it is consistent with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:50 am
Furthermore, Justice Scalia’s decision repeatedly invoked Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:25 pm
Comcast’s cert petition presented the case as a slam-dunk violation of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:12 am
(a) A party seeking to maintain a class action must be prepared to show that Rule 23(a)’s numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy-of-representation requirements have been met, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:10 pm
In its decision, the majority reiterated its Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:31 am
Ct. ---, 569 U.S. --- (2013), an important Rule 23 decision subsequent to 2011’s landmark Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:27 am
Pinkerton appealed the order shortly after the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:36 pm
§§ 1332(d)(2), (5)(B).) [read post]
