Search for: "S S
v.
State of Indiana"
Results 341 - 360
of 5,187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
That’s the question before the Indiana Supreme Court in Escamilla v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
That’s the question before the Indiana Supreme Court in Escamilla v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:54 pm
If a wholesaler in another state could sell wine direct to consumers, the state insists, the winery-to-wholesaler-to-retailer-to-consumer model would collapse. * * * Indiana does not defend the wholesale clause, though a trade association, which intervened to protect its economic interest, insists that the clause is valid. * * * The wholesale clause protects Indiana's wholesalers at the expense of Indiana's consumers and… [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:03 pm
Tuesday's Indiana Democratic primary provided an opportunity to see the effects of the state's voter ID statute in practice. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 8:14 am
We now have two different panels of the Indiana Court of Appeals agreeing that a trial court must consider the child custody modification criteria listed under the relocation statutes (Indiana Code 31-17-2.2-1 through -6) as well those under the child custody statute when dealing with a relocation/modification case.Wolljung v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
Vines, in Indiana, the RIAA has filed papers opposing the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim.In its opposition papers, the RIAA argues that the Court should not follow Interscope v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
Oyama v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 1:32 am
” Trump Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 11:07 am
State of Indiana (NFP). [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 5:05 pm
" Dagwood's Deli-sub Shop, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 9:23 am
The state argued birth certificate parentage in Indiana is based on biology, not parentage. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 4:42 am
Last week, the State of... [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:20 am
In a unanimous ruling on Tuesday, the Supreme Court overturned an Indiana Supreme Court decision that said that part of federal Constitution’s Eighth Amendment didn’t apply to the states. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 6:53 pm
As to its bright-line rule, the Court specifically noted that Indiana’s state and local legislatures could enact laws imposing different duties on landowners. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment, but the Supreme Court subsequently granted Voisine’s petition for certiorari, vacated the First Circuit’s judgment, and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of the intervening 2014 Supreme Court decision United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
The case, Brad & Tiffany Kelly v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 3:28 am
State, which the Indiana Supreme Court decided in January. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 8:18 am
Additional Resources: Menard, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:01 pm
In State of Indiana v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 6:20 am
In a new Indianapolis, Indiana, case, Priority v. [read post]
