Search for: "S. v. Social Security Administration"
Results 341 - 360
of 3,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
“Allord is correct that the Social Security Administration is bound to give a treating physician’s opinion controlling weight if her ‘opinion on the issue(s) of the nature and severity of [the [...] [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:52 am
The Social Security Administration (SSA) denied the claim initially and an SSA Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found after an administrative hearing that the claimant was not disabled. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:54 am
It is plain from the briefing that the great majority of those judges are in the Social Security Administration, though a substantial number of ALJs are scattered throughout other departments. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Food for Thought: The Social Security Administration brought its own experts to comment on our client’s complaints. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
The claim was rejected by the Social Security Administration because Florida law stated that a child could inherit through intestate succession only if conceived during the decedent's lifetime. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 7:30 am
” Gupta notes that the Social Security Administration’s interpretation of Section 405(g)’s finality requirement is not limited to Appeals Council dismissals on untimeliness grounds. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:46 pm
Astrue, a federal district court in Arkansas reversed a Social Security Administration (SSA) Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ's) decision denying disability benefits to a claimant suffering from a variety of physical ailments because the ALJ failed to resolve inconsistencies regarding the claimant's capacity to perform certain work. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 8:29 am
The justices added two cases, both involving benefits through the Social Security Administration, to their merits docket for next term. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:01 am
’“ (People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:22 pm
A person whose claim for disability benefits is denied by the Social Security Administration (SSA) can appeal the decision by requesting a hearing before an SSA Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 11:11 am
Arbitrator's imposing a penalty of "time served" while the employee was suspended without pay ruled arbitraryLance Greenstreet v Social Security Administration, USCA, Federal Circuit, Docket 2007-3312 In a grievance arising from defendant's termination of plaintiff-employee, an arbitrator's decision reinstating plaintiff without back pay is affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded where the denial of back… [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 10:45 pm
Colvin, a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, deals with the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program run by the United States Social Security Administration (SSA). [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s recent opinion in Washington v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Without the Social Security language in the worker’s compensation order, Social Security takes the amount of the settlement, exclusive of attorney’s fees, medical expenses, and other case expenses, and divides by the monthly amount of worker’s compensation benefits that the disabled worker has been receiving in temporary periodic payments. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:52 am
Colvin: SSDI Denials and Appeals appeared first on Massachusetts Social Security Disability Lawyers Blog. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:04 am
What is the 5 step process the Social Security Administration uses in determining eligibility for Social Security Disability Income Benefits (SSDI)? [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:19 pm
With the looming uncertainty of the FTC’s restitution and disgorgement authority in light of the Supreme Court’s consideration of AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:59 am
It should be noted that this entire process is set up in a way to favor the United States Social Security Administration (SSA), and it is especially difficult for an unrepresented claimant to be successful. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:33 pm
Social Security Administration (10th Cir., June 20, 2017) (affirming denial of social security benefits because Bell inadequately briefed her case: her arguments were little more than cursory statements without analysis)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
If one thing is already clear from President-Elect Trump's appointments it is that they see immigration and border security as far more tightly intertwined and far more salient as a national security issue than have their predecessors. [read post]
