Search for: "SEC v. Wills" Results 341 - 360 of 492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2008, 5:44 am
That indeed appears to be the case - the SC judgment in the first Laine case (Manzoor Sayeed Khan v. [read post]
The change of administration at the SEC and the issuance of SLB 14L appear to have served as an open season call for shareholder proponents: the number of proposals submitted surged, the percentage of proposals that shareholders were willing to withdraw as a result of negotiations dropped, and the number of proposals excluded through the no-action process plummeted. [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:00 am
We don't know what that title means; we just wanted to draw some mathematicians to our blog.Well, no.Actually, we just read United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
Earn CLE credits* Wait a sec. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Regulation means it’s less necessary to be on NYSE b/c I know you have met requirements that the SEC stands behind. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court, in a majority opinion by Justice Ruth Ginsburg [Ratslaf v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:03 pm
Interpreting Rule 34 and the Sedona principles, Aguilar v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument on Bond v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 10:05 pm by The Charge
Maryland was not a singular case; in Mooney v. [read post]