Search for: "SMITH v. DAVIS"
Results 341 - 360
of 765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 1:24 pm
Smith, American University Washington College of Law; and Nicole Smith Futrell, CUNY School of Law. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:05 am
Smith, International Criminal Justice Director/Legal Counsel, No Peace Without Justice, Brussels, Belgium; Professor Jonathan Todres, Georgia State University School of Law, Atlanta; and Yayoi Yamaguchi, Associate Legal Advisor, Legal Advisory Section, ICC Office of the Prosecutor. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Garrison v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
After Jeremy’s review of Trade Secrets and Undisclosed Information last week here, Sam Davies of the International Chamber of Commerce informs Kat-readers that the ICC has just released a new publication entitled Trade Secrets: Tools for Innovation and Collaboration. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:07 am
” Summary judgment for the county was affirmed on the employee’s retaliation claim (Davis v Fort Bend County, August 26, 2014, Prado, E). [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:38 am
could not have been a better segue way to today's decision from the 5th Circuit, Davis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:38 am
could not have been a better segue way to today's decision from the 5th Circuit, Davis v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
My students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan, and Michael Smith worked on it, and New Jersey lawyer Daniel Schmutter of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP was kind enough to agree to be pro bono local counsel — many thanks to him for that! [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:29 am
Davis, 427 F.3d 197, 212 n.14 (3rd Cir.2005) (“[V]ideotaping or photographing the police in the performance of their duties on public property may be protected activit[ies]”); Smith v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
Smith. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:18 am
Smith, which held that religious liberty loses to mandates imposed by generally applicable laws. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
Further finding that the retailer was not bound to inform the employee that her continued employment after receiving the letter constituted acceptance of the new terms of employment, the appeals court concluded that the parties entered into a valid agreement to arbitrate disputes on an individual basis (Davis v Nordstrom, Inc, June 23, 2014, Smith, W). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
Supreme Court’s 1979 decision of Smith v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Smith, Seventh Circuit: Appellant's good time credits were reinstated because there was no evidence that he used prison computers without authorization. [read post]
