Search for: "SMITH v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 341 - 360 of 1,294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2020, 5:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
Smith, decided last month by the Arkansas Supreme Court (in an opinion by Justice Shawn A. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Smith & Nephew, the IPR petitioner. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Obama, EFF Explains Why Metadata Matters and the Third-Party Doctrine Doesn’t (EFF) NSA Spying (EFF’s landing page re NSA spying and their use of metadata) EFF cases in relation to NSA spying and metadata in order of file date: Hepting v AT&T Jewel v NSA First Unitarian v NSA Smith v Obama Win! [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Jean Carroll’s defamation lawsuit against President Trump, a signal the case is moving forward despite attempts by the Justice Department to intervene. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Josh Blackman
When I speak with recent law school graduates, what I hear over and over is that they face harassment and retaliation if they say anything that departs from the law school orthodoxy. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm by rainey Reitman
If you have any feedback on this episode, please email podcast@eff.org Resources NSA & FBI Stellar wind NSA Collected US Email Records in Bulk for More than Two Years Under Obama (The Guardian) NSA's Stellar Wind Program Was Almost Completely Useless, Hidden From FISA Court by NSA and FBI (Techdirt) FAQ on NSA surveillance, including FAQs about EFF’s litigation to stop the mass surveillance (EFF) Pen trap and trace authority and wiretap authority and other electronic… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
  In support of this argument, Mooppan and CSS lawyer Lori Windham repeatedly cited Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm by Marty Lederman
Code 55-3700.61 (“The Department delegates its authority under Article IX of the Public Welfare Code (62 P.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
The last phrase of this rule was the part that gave Justice Sam Alito pause in his concurring opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 8:16 am by James Campbell
For one, the justices could jettison the flawed framework established in Employment Division v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 12:47 pm by Ilya Somin
Earlier today, as Jonathan Adler notes, the Supreme Court decided to hear Trump v. [read post]