Search for: "SMITH v. STATE OF MAINE" Results 341 - 360 of 718
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2015, 6:44 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Respectfully Submitted, Smith & Associates, LLP Lack of Options for Plaintiffs This motion to dismiss really underscores the main problem for alleged victims suing on these claims. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 8:04 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 8:53 am by Wystan Ackerman
I suggested that the proposed rule provision that would reinstitute a requirement for court approval of settlements with named plaintiffs should not be adopted because it could make settlement of nonmeritorious class actions more difficult, and goes against Smith v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
 In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
There were in fact two Smith & Nephew products to be considered: an earlier incarnation of the Smith & Nephew product ("the Original product") and an updated version (“the Modified product”); this Kat only concerns himself here with the events surrounding the Modified product, which is where the main issue of construction of numerical limitations in claims occurs.Whilst the patent itself has an undeniably chemical flavour, the case turned on… [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:42 pm by Edward Smith
Smith has been practicing personal injury law for over 30 years. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
The USA Freedom Act will likely affect EFF’s ongoing litigation against the NSA, including Smith v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 1:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
Solicitor General to provide the federal government’s views on the case of Smith v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:00 am by Wells Bennett
Legal challenges under the Convention have led to the reversal of long-standing policies on the discharge of homosexual service personnel (see Smith and Grady v UK), prompted a complete overhaul of the British military justice system to bring it into line with the requirements of the ECHR (see Findlay v UK) and set in motion the gradual extension of the European Convention’s scope of application to military operations conducted overseas (see Al-Skeini … [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 2008) (quoting Smith v. [read post]