Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF M. C., ET AL."
Results 341 - 360
of 523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
Circuit held that even if the accommodation did impose a substantial burden on one or more plaintiffs' religious exercise, the government has compelling reasons for rejecting any further accommodation or exemption, and that such interests cannot be adequately advanced by any less restrictive means. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:21 am
The most common Salmonella serogroups are A, B, C, D, E, F, and G. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Laurel M. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:29 pm
Sept. 2, 2009), available at http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/library-associations-supp-filing-sept-2-09.pdf; Letter from Privacy Authors and Publishers, et al., to Daralyn J. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:20 am
M. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Justice Barrett, writing for the Court, noted that the Court’s state action jurisprudence has largely focused upon “whether a nominally private person has engaged in state action,” not whether a state official had acted as a private citizen rather than a state actor. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
Aston Martin, et al. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm
As Chancellor Allen stated long ago, the threat cannot be justified on the grounds that the board knows what is in the best interests of the stockholders. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
It says “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:53 pm
Basedow et al. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 3:50 am
Baumeister et al., “Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life,” 8 J Positive Psych 505 (2013). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
Golden Door Properties, LLC et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:14 am
Stat. (2008) (emphasis added); see also Abraham Mora, et al., 12 FLA. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm
C. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
Lohmus, Havel & Viisemann, et al in 2005. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
” In a footnote, the panel adds: “To the extent that the states argue that social-media platforms lack the requisite ‘intent’ to convey a message, we find it implausible that platforms would engage in the laborious process of defining detailed community standards, identifying offending content, and removing or deprioritizing that content if they didn’t intend to convey ‘some sort of message. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Goossens H, Giesendorf AJ, Vandamme P, et al. (1995). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
