Search for: "STATE OF KANSAS v. STATE OF MISSOURI" Results 341 - 360 of 574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 7:58 am by Steven Koprince
United States, No. 12-622C (2013) involved a solicitation to provide laboratory testing services to the VA in the great state of Kansas, as well as in Missouri and Illinois. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
  The Missouri Supreme Court reaffirmed that Missouri is a pro-non-compete jurisdiction when it enforced non-compete and modified non-solicit agreements against non-resident former company employees. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
  The Missouri Supreme Court reaffirmed that Missouri is a pro-non-compete jurisdiction when it enforced non-compete and modified non-solicit agreements against non-resident former security company employees. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:34 pm by The Charge
  The issue of state sovereignty was not squarely before the Court, and the Missouri Compromise clearly wasn't since it has been effectively repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act two years earlier. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:26 pm by Andis Kaulins
Kansas State: Wildcats favored by 7 Our call: Kansas State 33-30    Result: - Penn State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm by Bill Raftery
V (title); Art III § 1 Kansas Art. 1 § 6 Kentucky Sections 114- 144 (title); Section 27 Louisiana Art. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:19 am by Luke Hagedorn
Literally and figuratively, Kansas and Missouri stand at the crossroads of the United State’s quest for an “all-of-the-above” energy policy. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:47 am by Bill Raftery
Florida Amendment 5 Article V, Section 2(a) of the Florida constitution grants the state’s Supreme Court a relatively broad rulemaking authority. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:16 am by Andis Kaulins
Kansas Jayhawks by 15.5 Kansas 38-17 Kansas 27-17 Missouri St. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:15 am by Steve Hall
"Missouri Supreme Court won’t set execution dates," by Jason Hancock for the Kansas City Star. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
If so, then governmental attempts to pressure manufacturers into not selling such guns to the public would likely themselves be unconstitutional conditions, unless manufacturers could still sell the guns through affiliate corporations, see Planned Parenthood of Mid-Missouri & Eastern Kansas, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Kyle Krull
The tort of IIEI was recently recognized in California with the case of Beckwith v. [read post]